To all the troops — gay, straight, and bi — thank you.
“It was very hard for men who wanted to come out of the closet in those days. The men that I knew — Monty and Jimmy [Dean] and Rock — if anything, I helped them get out of the closet. I didn’t even know I was doing it. I didn’t know that I was more advanced than most people in this town. It just never occurred to me.”
Who was James Dean? A shining beacon of talent whose bright light was extinguished far too early, Dean lived with a privacy that would be unheard of in today’s celebrity culture. “He was very afraid of being hurt,” costar Elizabeth Taylor said of Dean. “He was afraid of opening up in case it was turned around and used against him.”
The young actor, who starred in only three films before his fatal joy ride, became a bona fide icon after his death. His skill as an on-screen force was heralded by the best. He worked and walked with the rich and famous. Yet during his brief moment in the spotlight, Dean offered little insight into the man behind some of cinema’s most cherished characters. He had his demons, this is no secret, but the mystery that surrounded him during his life became nothing short of legend with his passing.
Rumored to have been the object of affection from men and women alike, Dean’s elusive sexuality has left many searching for answers. A screenwriter and theater student from UCLA, William Bast and James Dean lived together as roommates for a number of years. It would be more than fifty years after Dean’s death that William finally disclosed what many had already speculated: that his relationship with James was more than platonic.
Known for a ‘live and let live’ demeanor, Dean never seemed to go through life with restraints. He was even the subject of a well-known bet between Giant stars Elizabeth Taylor and Rock Hudson. “Elizabeth and Rock took bets on who could get James into bed first,” recounted Giant co-star Noreen Nash. Word got around.
So, who was James Dean? Was he a man open to new experiences, without regard to labels and gender? Or do we crave the fantasy of an icon of Dean’s stature – the image of sex, masculinity, and rebellion – as gay? Dean’s ambiguous relationship with Sal Mineo in the angst-ridden Rebel Without A Cause has led many to speculate and view this golden age film as years ahead of its time. Many, including Rebel director Nicholas Ray, have gone on the record to say Dean was gay and had knowledge of gay bars. Dean, unfortunately, isn’t here to settle the curiosity.
Perhaps, an extremely guarded individual, Dean learned early on to shield himself from the scrutiny of the public eye. We may never know who James Dean truly was, but we are left with some parting insight from the man of the hour: “I’m certainly not going through life with one hand tied behind my back.”
As for the bet, the Dame is said to have come up short.
Today, we pause.
In the past, I haven’t been the shyest when it comes to criticizing our elected officials. That’s because I believe in big government. I believe in its ability to be a force for good. I believe in protecting rights and extending a compassionate hand to those in need. When our government fails to live up to its potential, I think it’s our duty to call them out and keep them honest.
For you, it may be fair trade. Or reforming our jail system. For me, it’s the basic creed of our Declaration of Independence that has yet to be realized. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,” wrote Thomas Jefferson.
I’m critical because I believe in the greatness of America, and I will try to do my part to direct your attention where inequality exists. That has been my goal this semester and for this blog assignment, and it’s for that reason that I will continue this blog after the assignment ends.
But there are those days when you do see your government live up to its promise, when they make the tough decisions. And you’re proud. Proud to live in a country like America. You don’t have to revel in the death of another, but it’s okay to feel a sense of relief and catharsis. Okay to feel that a man who was far more evil than good, who murdered thousands of innocent men, women, and children, will never harm anyone again.
Justice has been served. Today, we’re reminded that government serves a very real and very important purpose.
Tomorrow is a new day, but let’s enjoy this one while it lasts.
“All men have an emotion to kill; when they strongly dislike some one they involuntarily wish he was dead. I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction.” – Clarence Darrow
In a move straight out of an Orwell novel, Tennessee state Senator Stacey Campfield’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill has advanced out of committee and will be sent to the Senate floor.
The bill would effectively criminalize teachers and school officials who talk about homosexuality before the ninth grade.
Conveying the message that being gay is neither appropriate nor suitable for public discussion, Campfield is attempting to further alienate and isolate a vulnerable population from seeking help and guidance from educators.
Supporters of the bill maintain age sensitivity is the primary goal, but Matthew Parsons, a socially conservative advocate and founder of the anti-gay “Something Better” campaign, may have spoken too soon. “If we’re talking about homosexuality, we are talking about specific acts that are going to be unhealthy for anybody to engage in outside of marriage.”
Let’s be clear. Campfield’s proposed bill has nothing to do with what is “age appropriate.” This is about fundamentally altering society. It would effectively prohibit speech and further push the civil rights struggle away from mainstream radar. Out of sight, out of mind.
“The ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill raises all kinds of issues about anti-gay bias, free speech and government overreach,” said Tennessee Equality’s Ben Byers. “It means [teachers] can’t talk about gay issues or sexuality even with students who may be gay or have [a] gay family.”
Once again, we are witnessing a scared GOP attempting to limit debate and stifle meaningful conversation. The party of small government seems perfectly supportive of government’s large hand so long as it furthers their culturally radical agenda.
Senator Campfield’s cowardly attempts to institutionalize discrimination are painfully obvious for anyone with half a mind to see. If it’s a debate about substantive issues you wish to have, I welcome that debate. But leave the children out of it.